2016 Presidential Election Oct 9, 2016 11:57:32 GMT -5
Post by mollypop on Oct 9, 2016 11:57:32 GMT -5
Impeached? Based on what, disagreeing with your opinions?
Citizens United was about as political as it gets. Except maybe for the "Bush wins" decision. Liberals have no monopoly on political Supreme Court decisions.
The folks that refuse to do their job for political reasons and not even consider Merrick Garland are the ones that ought to be impeached.
For what it's worth, Scalia recommended Kagan.
'For what it's worth, Scalia recommended Kagan.' Yes, but only because he was LIED to by her!
My own opinion? Well, yes - mine and MANY OTHERS...
Well Stan for starters, both of them LIED UNDER OATH to the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding their positions on the 2nd Amendment, among other things. Here, this'll do for starters. Then you can Google 'impeaching kagan, sotomayor' and come up with your own list of MANY impeachable offenses they have committed, admitted to, and just don't seem to care about the constitutionality as long as their decisions reflect their agenda and the Constitution be damned.
You can make your own list of impeachable offenses they both have committed Stan. They both have taken the SCOTUS bench under FALSE PRETENSES! They are not who they said they are at all (in sworn testimony) and their rulings are not only obviously and openly partisan, but agenda driven... Those two don't even try to disguise what they're doing and the old lady (Ginsburg) is even dotty enough to publicly criticize and demean a presidential candidate DURING the election cycle! Is that behavior the public expects of a Supreme Court Judge? uhhhh, hell no.
Rather than me give you a list of websites you can find to back up my 'opinion' again I suggest you simply Google 'impeaching kagan, sotomayor' and take your pick of them.